MATH 447: Real Variables - Homework #6
Jerich Lee
December 22, 2024
Problem.
[18.7] Prove $xe^{x} =2$ for some $x$ in $(0,1)$.
[18.7] Prove $xe^{x} =2$ for some $x$ in $(0,1)$.
Solution.
Proof.
Our goal is to show that $f=x$ and $g=e^{x}$ are both continuous, then invoke Theorem 17.4 part iii): Let $f$ and $g$ be real-valued functions that are continuous at $x_0$ in $\mathbb{R} $. Then:
$$\begin{align}
fg \text{ is continuous at } x_0
\end{align}$$
To show that $f=x$ is continuous, we can show the following:
$$\begin{align}
\left\vert x_n -x\right\vert <\varepsilon
\end{align}$$
Choosing $\delta{} =\epsilon{} $, we get:
$$\begin{align}
\left\vert x_{n} -x \right\vert <\delta \implies \left\vert f(x_n)-f(x) \right\vert <\epsilon
\end{align}$$
We wish to prove that the function $ f(x) = e^x $ is continuous.
Let $ \epsilon{} > 0 $. We need to show that for every $ \epsilon{} > 0 $, there exists $ \delta{} > 0 $ such that if $ |x - x_0| < \delta{} $, then $ |e^x - e^{x_0}| < \epsilon{} $.
Starting with the expression:
$$\begin{align}
|e^x - e^{x_0}| &= e^{x_0} |e^{x - x_0} - 1|
\end{align}$$
Now, we use the elementary inequality:
$$\begin{align}
e^y &\geq 1 + y
\end{align}$$
For $ y = -y $, we get:
$$\begin{align}
e^{-y} &\geq 1 - y
\end{align}$$
which implies:
$$\begin{align}
\frac{1}{1 - y} &\geq e^y \quad \text{for } y < 1
\end{align}$$
Hence:
$$\begin{align}
|e^y - 1| &\leq \max \left\{ |y|, \left| \frac{y}{1 - y} \right| \right\} \quad \text{for } y < 1
\end{align}$$
Thus, taking $ y = x - x_0 $, we have:
$$\begin{align}
|e^y - 1| &\leq \max \left\{ |y|, \left| \frac{y}{1 - y} \right| \right\}
\end{align}$$
Now, choose $ \delta{} $ small enough such that $ |y| = |x - x_0| < \delta{} $ satisfies:
$$\begin{align}
\max \left\{ |y|, \left| \frac{y}{1 - y} \right| \right\} &< e^{-x_0} \epsilon
\end{align}$$
and $ |y| < 1 $.
Therefore, we can conclude that $ e^x $ is continuous at $ x_0 $.
\vspace{.5cm}
Invoking Theorem 17.4 iii), we show that $xe^{x}$ is a continuous function. To show that there exists $x$ such that $h=xe^{x}=2$, we can show that pick two points in $(0,1)$ : $x_1=0.01$, and $x_2=0.99$, and substitute these into $h$, getting $h(x_1)=0.01$ and $f(x_2)=2.66$. $h(x_1)<2<h(x_2)$, and because $h$ is continuous on $(0,1)$, we can invoke the IVT, which proves that there exists $x$ such that $xe^{x}=2$.
∎
Problem.
[21.2] Consider $f:S\to{} S^{*}$ where $S,d$ and $S^{*}, d^{*}$ are metric spaces. Show that $f$ is continuous at $s_{0}\in{} S $ if and only if for every open set $U$ in $S^{*} $ containing $f(s_{0} )$, there is an open set $V$ in $S$ containing $s_{0}$ such that $f(V) \subseteq{} U$.
[21.2] Consider $f:S\to{} S^{*}$ where $S,d$ and $S^{*}, d^{*}$ are metric spaces. Show that $f$ is continuous at $s_{0}\in{} S $ if and only if for every open set $U$ in $S^{*} $ containing $f(s_{0} )$, there is an open set $V$ in $S$ containing $s_{0}$ such that $f(V) \subseteq{} U$.
Solution.
Proof.
$\implies{}:$ The goal is to show that every point in $V$ has a neighborhood, i.e., is open. Because $U$ is open, we know that there exists $r=\varepsilon{}$ for each point $y\in{} U$. Because $f$ is continuous, we also know that there is a corresponding $\delta{}>0$ such that $s\in{} B_{\delta{}}(x)=V$, so this implies that there exists an open ball $V$ around each point $s$ in $S$. Because $d(s,s_0)<\delta{} \implies{} d(f(s),f(s))<\varepsilon{}$, and $\delta{} = V$, $\varepsilon{} \subseteq{} U$, as there may be other points not in $\delta{}$ that map into $U$, this implies $f(V)\subseteq{} U$.
\vspace{.5cm}
$\impliedby{}:$ We know that $V$ is open for every $U$ in $S^{*}$. Choose $\varepsilon{} \in{} U \ s.t. \ \varepsilon{} >0$. Then choose $\delta{} \in{} V \ s.t. \ \delta{} >0$. By implication, we know that $\delta{}$ is open. Then, we can state that $d(s, s_0)<\delta{} \implies{} d(f(s),f(s_0))<\varepsilon{}$, which is the definition of continuity at a point.
∎
Problem.
[21.3] Let $(S,d)$ be a metric space and choose $s_{0} \in{} S$. Show $f(s)=d(s,s_{0})$ defines a uniformly continuous real-valued function $f$ on $S$.
[21.3] Let $(S,d)$ be a metric space and choose $s_{0} \in{} S$. Show $f(s)=d(s,s_{0})$ defines a uniformly continuous real-valued function $f$ on $S$.
Solution.
Proof.
We to show the definition of continuity:
$$\begin{align}
\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists \delta > 0 \text{ such that } d_Y(f(p), f(q)) &< \epsilon \\
\forall p, q \in X \text{ for which } d_X(p, q) &< \delta.
\end{align}$$
We know that:
$$\begin{align}
f(s_0) = d(s_0, s_0) = 0 \\[10pt]
f(p)= d(p, s_0) \\[10pt]
f(q)= d(q, s_0) \\[10pt]
d_Y(f(p),f(q))\leq d(f(p)) + d(f(q))\\[10pt]
\end{align}$$
We want to show using the triangle inequality:
$$\begin{align}
d(f(p),f(q))\leq d(f(p),f(s_0))+d(f(q),f(s_0))< \varepsilon
\end{align}$$
From Eqn 13, 14, and 15, we can say:
$$\begin{align}
d(f(p),f(q))\leq d(p,s_0)+d(q,s_0).
\end{align}$$
Choosing $p,q$ such that $d(p,s_0)<\frac{\varepsilon}{2}$ and $d(q,s_0)<\varepsilon{}$ , we can pick $\delta{} =\varepsilon{}$ and use Eqn 14 and 15 to show:
$$\begin{align}
d(f(p),f(q))\leq d(f(p))+d(f(q))\\[10pt]
\leq d(p,s_0)+d(q,s_0)<\varepsilon
\end{align}$$
∎
Problem.
[21.4] Consider $f:S\to{} \mathbb{R} $ where $(S,d)$ is a metric space. Show the following are equivalent:
[21.4] Consider $f:S\to{} \mathbb{R} $ where $(S,d)$ is a metric space. Show the following are equivalent:
- $f$ is continuous;
- $f^{-1}((a,b)) $ is open in $S$ for all $a<b$;
- $f^{-1}((a,b))$ is open in $S$ for all rational $a<b$.
Solution.
Proof.
$1\implies{} 2$: We know that any open interval $(a,b)$ in $R^{1}$ is complete, i.e., every subsequence converges to a limit point contained in $\mathbb{R}$. Therefore, $(a,b)$ is an open set in $\mathbb{R}$. We know from Problem 2 that if $f$ is continuous, then every open set in the range corresponds to an open set in the domain. $(a,b)$ is open, so $f^{-1}(a,b)$ is also open.
∎
Proof.
$1\implies{} 3$: By $1\implies{} 2$, we know that if $a,b\in{} \mathbb{Q} $, then $(a,b)$ is open by the denseness of the rationals, i.e., between every real there exists a rational.
∎
Proof.
$3\implies{} 1$: We achieve this by taking the converse of $1\implies{} 3$, which exists by the bijection of $1\implies{} 2$.
∎
Proof.
$2\implies{} 1$: This exists by the bijection of $1\implies{} 2$.
∎
Proof.
$3\implies{} 2$: This is always true by the denseness of the rationals.
∎
Proof.
$2\implies{} 3$: This is always true, as $\mathbb{Q} \subset{} \mathbb{R}$
∎
Problem.
[21.5] Let $E$ be a noncompact subset of $\mathbb{R}^{k}$.
[21.5] Let $E$ be a noncompact subset of $\mathbb{R}^{k}$.
- Show there is an unbounded continuous real-valued function on $E$. \emph{Hint}: Either $E$ is unbounded or else its closure $E^{-}$ contains $\mathbf{x}_{0} \notin E$. In the latter case, use $\frac{1}{g}$ where $g(\mathbf{x}) =d(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x}_{0})$.
- Show there is a bounded continuous real-valued function on $E$ that does not assume its maximum on $E$.
Solution.
- Suppose that $E$ is bounded, and $x_0$ is not a point of $E$. To show that there exists a continuous unbounded real-valued function on $E$, consider the function: $$\begin{align} f(x)=\frac{1}{x-x_0} \end{align}$$ This function is continuous on $E$.
- Suppose that $E$ is unbounded. Then, $f(x)=x$ is unbounded and is a continuous real-valued function on $E$.
- Suppose that $E$ is bounded. Then the following: $$\begin{align} g(x)=\frac{1}{1+(x-x_0)^{2}} \end{align}$$ $g(x)$ is bounded, as $0<g(x)<1$ for all $x$. $g(x)$ has no maximal element, as $x_0$ is not a member of $E$.
Problem.
[21.10(d)] Explain why there are no continuous functions mapping $[0,1]$ onto $(0,1)$ or $\mathbb{R}$.
[21.10(d)] Explain why there are no continuous functions mapping $[0,1]$ onto $(0,1)$ or $\mathbb{R}$.
Solution.
We know that $[0,1]$ is compact according to the according to the Heine-Borel Theorem, as it is closed and bounded. According to Theorem 21.4, if $E$ is compact, then $f(E)$ is compact. $(0,1)$ and $\mathbb{R}$ are not compact, so this contradicts Theorem 21.4..
Problem.
Is it true that any bounded continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous?
Is it true that any bounded continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous?
Solution.
No. Choose $f=\frac{1}{x-x_0}$ with $x\in{} (0,x_0)$. Uniform continuity states that $\forall{} \varepsilon{}, \exists{} \delta{} \ s.t. \ d(p,q)<\delta{} \implies{} d(f(p),f(q))$ for all $p, q$. Choose an arbitrary $\varepsilon{}$. Then, there exists a corresponding $\delta{}$ such that $d(x,x_0)<\delta{}\implies{} d(f(x),f(x_0))<\varepsilon{}$. But as we take the same $\delta{}$ about $x$ closer and closer to $x_0$, $d(f(x),f(x_n))$ will grow larger and larger, eventually exceeding our chosen $\varepsilon{}$. Therefore, there exists no constant $\delta{}$ that satisfies our chosen $\varepsilon{}$. Therefore, our bounded, continuous function $f$ is not uniformly continuous.